Motion to Amend Judgment
22CV010031: ZK OAKLAND PROPERTIES, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY vs GOLDEN STREAM PROPERTIES, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, et al. 08/11/2026 Hearing on Motion to Amend Judgment filed by ZK Oakland Properties, LLC, a California limited liability company (Plaintiff) CRS# 188243981098 in Department 22
Tentative Ruling - 08/10/2026 Han N. Tran
The Motion to Amend Judgment filed by ZK Oakland Properties, LLC, a California limited liability company on 07/07/2026 is Granted.
Plaintiff ZK Oakland Properties, LLCs unopposed motion to amend judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff sets forth sufficient evidence to establish that Urban Properties Management, LLC is the alter ego of Judgment Debtor Kwong Lai and that the interests of justice are served by adding UPM as a judgment debtor. Plaintiff shall promptly submit a proposed order for the courts review and signature.
If the matter is contested, the hearing will be held on August 12, 2026 at 3:00pm instead of August 11, 2026 at 3:00pm. (NOTE THE NEW DATE)
HOW DO I CONTEST A TENTATIVE RULING? THROUGH eCOURT Notify the Court and all the other parties no later than 4:00 PM one court day before the scheduled hearing, and briefly identify the issues you wish to argue through the following steps: 1. Log into eCourt Public Portal 2. Case Search 3. Enter the Case Number and select Search 4. Select the Case Name 5. Select the Tentative Rulings Tab 6. Select Click to Contest this Ruling 7. Enter your Name and Reason for Contesting 8. Select Proceed BY EMAIL Send an email to the DEPARTMENT CLERK (dept22@alameda.courts.ca.gov) and all the other parties no later than 4:00 PM one court day before the scheduled hearing.
This will permit the department clerk to send invitations to counsel to appear remotely. Notice via BOTH eCourt AND email is required. The tentative ruling will become the ruling of the court if no party contests the tentative ruling.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”