S.C. v. COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, et al.

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: SEPTEMBER 2, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.

TENTATIVE RULINGS ARE NOT POSTED IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES

Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.

No. 22CV02216

S.C. v. COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, et al.

DEFENDANT PARENTS CENTER’S MOTION TO BE RELIEVED

The court intends to grant the unopposed motion and sign the order submitted by counsel, but either a representative from Parents Center or replacement counsel is ordered to appear at the hearing (in person or by Zoom).

No. 26CV00235

WELLS FARGO, N.A. v. THAYER

(UNOPPOSED) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The unopposed motion is granted. Judgment will be entered in favor of plaintiff.

I. BACKGROUND This is a limited jurisdiction collection matter filed by plaintiff Wells Fargo, N.A. against defendant Tyler Thayer seeking $6,214.94 for an unpaid credit card debt. There are two causes of action for breach of contract. Defendant, who is self-represented, filed an answer and affirmative defenses. Despite proper service, defendant did not oppose the motion.