DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV02204·santacruz·Civil·Motion to be relieved as counsel
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

YEUNG v. SANTA CRUZ COMMUNITY CU et al.

PLAINTIFF BENSON YEUNG’S MOTION TO BE RELIEVED

Hearing date
May 19, 2026
Department
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 18, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBENSON YEUNG
DefendantSANTA CRUZ COMMUNITY CU

Ruling

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: MAY 19, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.

TENTATIVE RULINGS ARE NOT POSTED IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES

Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.

No. 24CV02204

YEUNG v. SANTA CRUZ COMMUNITY CU et al.

PLAINTIFF BENSON YEUNG’S MOTION TO BE RELIEVED

The court continues the motion to June 18, 2026, so that counsel can provide notice of the new hearing date. Counsel shall also file an updated declaration and proposed order indicating that notice and the updated hearing date.

No. 24CV03214

KAWASH et al. v. WARREN, et al.

(UNOPPOSED) PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES BY DEFENDANT THERESA WARREN TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (SET ONE) AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS

The unopposed motion is granted. Defendant Theresa Warren shall serve verified code compliant further responses and production to Request for Production of Documents, Set One, nos. 21 through 40, including promised text messages, no later than June 22, 2026.

Plaintiffs demonstrated they served the discovery at issue on March 4, 2025, and despite many extensions of time, defendant has not fully complied with her discovery obligations and promises to produce. (Miller Declaration, ¶¶ 2-20.)

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share