ERIK GAENSLER VS. STACEY SMITH ET AL

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680447 - November 18, 2025 Hearing date: November 18, 2025 Case number: CUD25680447 Case title: ERIK GAENSLER VS. STACEY SMITH ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680447 | Case Title: | | ERIK GAENSLER VS. STACEY SMITH ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-11-18 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion To Quash The Unlawful Detainer Complaint | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 18, 2025. Line 16.1. DEFENDANT STACEY SMITH AN INDIIVIDUAL, MICHAEL MAHER Motion To Quash The Unlawful Detainer Complaint; is DENIED.

The cause of action asserted in the Complaint is for unlawful detainer, and Defendants do not contend that the statutory requirements for service of process were not fulfilled. Defendants may not use a motion to quash as a means of disputing the merits of the unlawful detainer complaint's allegations or to argue Plaintiff failed to comply with the pleading requirements specific to unlawful detainer actions set out in CCP 1166. (Stancil v. Superior Court (2021) 11 Cal.5th 381, 390-91.) =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |