DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26681381·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing about 2 months agoDENIED

2032 POLK STREET LLC VS. HARVEY SALVADOR ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT And Notice Of Motion

Hearing date
Jul 23, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

Plaintiff2032 POLK STREET LLC
DefendantHARVEY SALVADOR

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 23, 2026. Line 16. PLAINTIFF 2032 POLK STREET LLC MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT And Notice Of Motion is DENIED.

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment on the grounds that there is not triable issue of material fact and Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the cause of action for unlawful detainer based on non-payment of rent. (Plaintiff's Notice of Motion.)

Plaintiff has not met its initial burden on the grounds asserted. Plaintiff's Complaint does not assert a cause of action for unlawful detainer based on non-payment of rent, nor do the moving papers discuss the elements of such a cause of action or offer evidence establishing those elements.=(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share