DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25680300·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing 9 months agoOVERRULED

ABZ MISSION LLC VS. GUADALUPE CASTILLO ET AL

DEMURRER to COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Nov 19, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffABZ MISSION LLC
DefendantGUADALUPE CASTILLO

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680300 - November 19, 2025 Hearing date: November 19, 2025 Case number: CUD25680300 Case title: ABZ MISSION LLC VS. GUADALUPE CASTILLO ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680300 | Case Title: | | ABZ MISSION LLC VS. GUADALUPE CASTILLO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-11-19 13:30 PM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 19, 2025. Line 20. DEFENDANT GUADALUPE CASTILLO DEMURRER to COMPLAINT is OVERRULED, 5 days to answer from notice of entry of order.

The Complaint states a cause of action for unlawful detainer and is not uncertain. This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge.(505/MT) Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share