| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
DEFENDANT MOTOYOSHI KOMORI's DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678488 - October 24, 2025 Hearing date: October 24, 2025 Case number: CUD25678488 Case title: EQUITY RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT, LLC VS. MOTOYOSHI KOMORI ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678488 | Case Title: | | EQUITY RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT, LLC VS. MOTOYOSHI KOMORI ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-24 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | REAL PROPERTY/HOUSING MOTIONS CALENDAR | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for October 24, 2025. Line 11.
DEFENDANT MOTOYOSHI KOMORI's DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT is SUSTAINED in part, with leave to amend within 5 days of notice of entry of order, and OVERRULED in part. Specifically, leave to amend is granted solely to amend the proofs of service attached as Exhibit 3 to address the deficiencies raised in the demurrer, and to include an explanation for said amendment(s) in the amended pleading. The demurrer is otherwise overruled.
This matter will be heard in department 318 by the Honorable Christopher C. Hite at 9:30 a.m. per the order of the presiding judge. =(501/CH) Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom Information for Department 318 (Meeting ID: 160 1140 0818; Password: 976491)
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”