DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25628580·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 11 months agoOFF CALENDAR. Stipulation for Order Confirming the Appointment of Receiver on file.

LONE OAK FUND, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY VS. 1745 MARKET ASSOCIATES, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED ET AL

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER - RENTS, ISSUES AND PROFITS

Hearing date
Oct 3, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLONE OAK FUND, LLC
Defendant1745 MARKET ASSOCIATES, LLC

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25628580 - October 3, 2025 Hearing date: October 3, 2025 Case number: CGC25628580 Case title: LONE OAK FUND, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY VS. 1745 MARKET ASSOCIATES, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25628580 | Case Title: | | LONE OAK FUND, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY VS. 1745 MARKET ASSOCIATES, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-03 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER - RENTS, ISSUES AND PROFITS | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for October 3, 2025, line 5.

OSC re: Temporary Restraining Order is OFF CALENDAR. Stipulation for Order Confirming the Appointment of Receiver on file. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252].

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share