DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24620014·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoGRANTED

5910 INVESTMENTS, LLC VS. 1000 VAN NESS LP, 1000 VAN NESS OWNERS ASSOCIATION ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Appointment Of Receiver

Hearing date
Jun 16, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

Plaintiff5910 INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant1000 VAN NESS LP
Defendant1000 VAN NESS OWNERS ASSOCIATION

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 16, 2025 line 2. PLAINTIFF 5910 INVESTMENTS, LLC NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF RECEIVER is GRANTED pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 564(b)(1) and (b)(9). The interim receivership is hereby terminated. Michael G. Kasolas is appointed Receiver for 1000 Van Ness Owners Association. Parties to provide the Court with an Order substantively tracking the language in the Interim Order filed May 7, 2025. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share