DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25622590·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoGRANTED

LOAN OAK FUND, LLC VS. 2700 SLOAT HOLDING LLC ET AL

OSC RE TURNOVER OF RECEIVERSHIP ESTATE PROPERTY - SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

Hearing date
Jun 12, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLOAN OAK FUND, LLC
Defendant2700 SLOAT HOLDING LLC

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 12, 2025. Line 6. OSC RE TURNOVER OF RECEIVERSHIP ESTATE PROPERTY(SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING)

Receiver's Motion is GRANTED. Defendant has not complied with the Court's May 22, 2025 order or the order appointing Receiver. Defendant is ordered to turnover the rental income and prepaid rents sought in the Receivers Motion. To the extent that Defendant no longer possesses those funds, Defendant is ordered to pay the Receiver the amount that they received in rental income and prepaid rents on November 1, 2024 and December 30, 2024. Defendant is further ordered to provide courtesy copies of their supplemental declaration by 8:30 am on the day of the hearing. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share