DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24615447·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 11 months agoSUSTAINED with leave to amend

CURTIS ANDERSON ET AL VS. MERCY HOUSING MANAGEMENT GROUP ET AL

DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Oct 7, 2025
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCURTIS ANDERSON
DefendantMERCY HOUSING MANAGEMENT GROUP

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24615447 - October 7, 2025 Hearing date: October 7, 2025 Case number: CGC24615447 Case title: CURTIS ANDERSON ET AL VS. MERCY HOUSING MANAGEMENT GROUP ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24615447 | Case Title: | | CURTIS ANDERSON ET AL VS. MERCY HOUSING MANAGEMENT GROUP ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-07 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for October 7, 2025, line 2.

Defendant's Demurrer to Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED with leave to amend for each Plaintiff to allege facts in support of each cause of action. Conclusory generalized allegations are not sufficient. Plaintiffs shall have 60 days for file an amended complaint. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share