DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25624373·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing about 1 year agoSUSTAINED with leave to amend all causes of action

AMANDA SILK VS. NAIM NAZZAL ET AL

DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jul 24, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffAMANDA SILK
DefendantNAIM NAZZAL ET AL

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25624373 - July 24, 2025 Hearing date: July 24, 2025 Case number: CGC25624373 Case title: AMANDA SILK VS. NAIM NAZZAL ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25624373 | Case Title: | | AMANDA SILK VS. NAIM NAZZAL ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-07-24 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for July 24, 2025, line 4.

Defendant's Demurrer to Amended Complaint is SUSTAINED with leave to amend all causes of action.

Cause of action 3 improperly combines two causes of action.

Cause of action 4 is uncertain as to when and to whom Plaintiff's complaints were communicated, and fails to allege other elements of Section 1942.5(a).

Causes of action 5 and 8 are uncertain for the same reason as cause of action 4.

Cause of action 5 also fails to elaborate as to how "misclassifying the unit" would violate the rent ordinance.

Cause of action 8 does not allege sufficient facts to state the element of IIED that the conduct was extreme and outrageous.

Cause of action 9 fails to allege elements of an interference claim and contradicts itself as to whether Plaintiff's business was ever "operated" because the Complaint also says the business was "unable to launch."

Cause of action 10 does not allege elements of a UCL violation.

Cause of action 11 fails to state a cause of action because it does not allege that Defendant's conduct exceeded this Court's order.

=(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share