DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24613407·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 10 months agoDENIED

SEN- SEI ET AL VS. AVANATH CRESCENT COVE, LP ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT , Or In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Thereof

Hearing date
Oct 27, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSEN- SEI ET AL
DefendantAVANATH CRESCENT COVE, LP

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24613407 - October 27, 2025 Hearing date: October 27, 2025 Case number: CGC24613407 Case title: SEN- SEI ET AL VS. AVANATH CRESCENT COVE, LP ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24613407 | Case Title: | | SEN- SEI ET AL VS. AVANATH CRESCENT COVE, LP ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-27 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, Or In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Thereof | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for October 27, 2025. Line 2.

DEFENDANT AVANATH CRESCENT COVE, LP MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, Or In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Thereof is DENIED.

Motion for Summary adjudication is DENIED. Moving party failed to comply with CRC 3.1350(b). Compare Notice of Motion and Separate Statement.

Motion for Summary Judgment in DENIED. Multiple triable issues of fact. See Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Separate Statement and Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Additional Facts. Furthermore, Defendant failed to produce admissible evidence to support Fact 27 in Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts. Plaintiff's Objections to the Declaration of Nicole Russell, Ex. M (Declaration of Nicole Gray) are sustained. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share