| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679305 - December 3, 2025 Hearing date: December 3, 2025 Case number: CUD25679305 Case title: MERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA VS. SHIRIN M. MIZANI ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679305 | Case Title: | | MERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA VS. SHIRIN M. MIZANI ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-12-03 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for December 3, 2025. Line 13. DEFENDANT SHIRIN MIZANI MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; is DENIED.
Moving party failed to shift their burden and show that there are no triable issues of fact. No evidence is presented that forms attached to the operative notice have been replaced by the new form at the time of the service of the notice. The May 2025 Newsletter attached to Mouton declaration states that the transaction became effective in May. It states: "Newly published forms will replace previously expired versions," using future tense. =(501/AAT)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”