DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC18571355·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 10 months agoStatus Report

JENNIFER SARKANY ET AL VS. CHRISTIE WEST ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion Finding Defendants In Contempt For Violating Court Orders; Request For Monetary Sanctions Against Defendants Christie West And Timothy West And Attorney Frank Kim

Hearing date
Oct 24, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Sanctions rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJENNIFER SARKANY
DefendantCHRISTIE WEST
DefendantTIMOTHY WEST

Attorneys

Frank Kimfor Defendant

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC18571355 - October 24, 2025 Hearing date: October 24, 2025 Case number: CGC18571355 Case title: JENNIFER SARKANY ET AL VS. CHRISTIE WEST ET AL Case Number: | | CGC18571355 | Case Title: | | JENNIFER SARKANY ET AL VS. CHRISTIE WEST ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-24 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion Finding Defendants In Contempt For Violating Court Orders; Request For Monetary Sanctions Against Defendants Christie West And Timothy West And Attorney Frank Kim |

Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for October 24, 2025. Line 1. PLAINTIFFS' Motion Finding Defendants In Contempt For Violating Court Orders; Request For Monetary Sanctions Against Defendants Christie West And Timothy West And Attorney Frank Kim Status Report. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share