DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC18571355·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 year agoCONTINUED

JENNIFER SARKANY ET AL VS. CHRISTIE WEST ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Contempt And To Compel Document Production From Defendant Christie West; Request For Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant Christie West

Hearing date
Jun 12, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 20, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJENNIFER SARKANY
PlaintiffRAMSEY ABOUREMELEH
PlaintiffSANDRA FIERRO
PlaintiffNINA ROBINS
DefendantCHRISTIE WEST

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 12, 2025. Line 1. PLAINTIFF JENNIFER SARKANY, RAMSEY ABOUREMELEH, SANDRA FIERRO, NINA ROBINS Notice Of Motion And Motion For Contempt And To Compel Document Production From Defendant Christie West; Request For Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant Christie West is CONTINUED to June 20, 2025 at 9:30 a.m., for the moving party to comply with LRSF 2.7B and provide courtesy copies of the moving papers no later than June 13, 2025, with a cover letter reflecting the new hearing date. (No opposition filed.) =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share