DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23610024·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 10 months agoDENIED

RICK HUYNH ET AL VS. HUONG NGOC HUYNH ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Contempt; Sanctions Against Plaintiffs And Plaintiffs' Counsel

Hearing date
Oct 21, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffRICK HUYNH
DefendantHUONG NGOC HUYNH
DefendantTONY HUYNH
DefendantHENRY HUYNH

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23610024 - October 21, 2025 Hearing date: October 21, 2025 Case number: CGC23610024 Case title: RICK HUYNH ET AL VS. HUONG NGOC HUYNH ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23610024 | Case Title: | | RICK HUYNH ET AL VS. HUONG NGOC HUYNH ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-21 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Contempt; Sanctions Against Plaintiffs And Plaintiffs' Counsel | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for October 21, 2025. Line 4. DEFENDANT HUONG HUYNH, TONY HUYNH, HENRY HUYNH Notice Of Motion And Motion For Contempt; Sanctions Against Plaintiffs And Plaintiffs' Counsel is DENIED. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share