DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24614584·sf·Civil·Employment Law
Hearing 9 months agoGRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART

Hiu Ho v. Okta, Inc., a Delaware Corporation et al

Motion to Compel Further Responses to Plaintiff's Special Interrogatories (Set One) and Form Interrogatories - Employment Law (Set One)

Hearing date
Nov 17, 2025
Department
302
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffHiu Ho
DefendantOkta, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CGC24614584 - November 17, 2025 Hearing date: November 17, 2025 Case number: CGC24614584 Case title: HIU HO VS. OKTA, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24614584 | Case Title: | | HIU HO VS. OKTA, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-11-17 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Further Responses To Plaintiff'S Special Interrogatories (Set One) And Form Interrogatories - Employment Law (Set One); Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support | Rulings: | | Matter on calendar for Monday, November 17, 2025, Line 8, PLAINTIFF HIU HO's, Motion To Compel Further Responses To Plaintiff's Special Interrogatories (Set One) And Form Interrogatories - Employment Law (Set One). (Complete tentative rulilng emailed to the parties).

Plaintiff Hiu Ho's Motion To Compel Further Responses To Plaintiff's Special Interrogatories (Set One) And Form Interrogatories - Employment Law (Set One) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ). | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share