DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVPG20-0030500·shasta·Probate·Termination of Guardianship
Hearing todayGRANTED.

Guardianship of Michael McMullen Jr.

Petition for Termination of Guardianship

Hearing date
Aug 31, 2026
Department
42
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherMichael McMullen Jr.
PetitionerJamie Gutzman

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: CVPG20-0030500 Disclosure Re: guardianship cases involving Shasta County Health and Human Services Agency-Judge Wood discloses that her step-daughter, Erinn Watts, is the Administrative Branch Director of the Health and Human Services Agency. In that position, Judge Wood’s step-daughter does not have any involvement in the investigation, management, prosecution or defense of guardianship cases. However, the Court makes this disclosure of an employment relationship between an investigating agency and the Court’s first degree relative as required by California Code of Judicial Ethics.

This matter is on calendar for further proceedings on a Petition for Termination of Guardianship filed by the mother, Jamie Gutzman. Proof of service has been filed for the siblings Jayden and Jasmine. The matter has been properly noticed. No objections have been raised. The Court has reviewed and considered the Children’s Services report filed on May 14, 2026, and agrees with the recommendation to grant the Petition.

The Petition is GRANTED. A proposed Order has been submitted and will be executed by the Court. Upon execution of the order, the clerk is instructed to close the file and vacate all future dates. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

GUARDIANSHIP OF JACOB PELTON-HERNANDEZ

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share