DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVPG20-0030500·shasta·Probate·Annual Review / Termination of Guardianship
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

Guardianship of Michael McMullen Jr.

Order to Show Cause; Petition for Termination of Guardianship

Hearing date
Jun 1, 2026
Department
42
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 29, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerJamie Gutzman
OtherMichael McMullen Jr.

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: CVPG20-0030500 The matter is on calendar for further proceedings on the Annual Review. This matter is also on calendar for hearing on an Order to Show Cause issued to the Guardian for failure to file a Confidential Guardianship Status Report and failure to appear on April 6, 2026. The Confidential Guardianship Status Report has not been submitted. No response to the Order to Show Cause has been filed.

Additionally, this matter is on calendar for further proceedings on a Petition for Termination of Guardianship filed by the mother, Jamie Gutzman. A new Notice of Hearing has not been filed and served for today’s date. There is no valid proof of service of the Notice of Hearing and Petition for the minor, guardian, father, maternal grandmother, paternal grandfather, or siblings. Insufficient information has been provided to permit the Court to dispense with notice to these parties. All parties may be served by mail. The Court has reviewed the Children’s Services report filed on May 14, 2026, which recommends granting the Petition.

The matter is continued to Monday, June 29, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 42 for further proceedings on the Petition for Termination of Guardianship, Annual Review, and Order to Show Cause. Petitioner is required to file and serve a new Notice of Hearing for the continued hearing

date, along with a copy of the Petition, on the parties identified above. In the alternative, if Petitioner cannot serve the parties identified, the Court will require a declaration explaining in detail all efforts of Petitioner to locate and serve them and why they cannot be served, to permit the Court to dispense with notice. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

GUARDIANSHIP OF MARCUS MITCHELL

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share