WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. VS. CHRISTOPHER A BERG

August 31, 2026 LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR PAGE 19 Judge: HONORABLE DAVID A. SILBERMAN, DEPARTMENT 11 ________________________________________________________________________

02:00 PM 26-CLJ-00451 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. VS. CHRISTOPHER A BERG LINE 8

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. STEPHANIE RAMOS CHRISTOPHER A. BERG PRO PER

PLAINTIFF: WELLS FARGO BANK’S MOTION FOR AN ORDER DEEMING THE TRUTH OF THE MATTERS SPECIFIED IN PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS AS ADMITTED

TENTATIVE RULING:

Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s Motion for an Order Deeming the Truth of the Matters Specified in Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions as Admitted is DENIED without prejudice. It appears from the proof of service that Defendant was served by mail, but the mailing did not include the defendant’s apartment number (which is included on the Proof of Service of the summons and in the Court’s file). Accordingly, and in light of the lack of opposition, the Court has no way of knowing whether the papers were actually delivered to Defendant.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must email Dept11@sanmateocourt.org with a copy to all other parties by 4:00 p.m. stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court. Thereafter, counsel for the moving party shall prepare for the Court’s signature a written order consistent with the Court’s ruling pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312 and provide written notice of the ruling to all parties who have appeared in the action, as required by law and by the California Rules of Court. Please note that Local Rule 3.403(b)(iv) states in part “prevailing party on a tentative ruling is required to prepare a proposed order REPEATING VERBATIM the tentative ruling” (emphasis added). The order should be efiled only, do not email or mail a hard copy to the Court.