Motion to Deem Requests for Admissions Admitted
Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne Consolidated Calendar Commissioner Steven Streger
Department 5 May 6, 2026 8:30 am DA Case # Date Filed
18 CVL67145 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. vs. Brittney A. Burd 04/08/2025
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Attorney: Harlan Reese
Brittney A. Burd Attorney: Timothy Reed Motion Hearing - Other to Deem Requests for Admissions Admitted/Nonappearance 04/08/2025 Complaint File Tracking 04/17/2025 High Density
Case notes are not tentative rulings. Parties and counsel are expected to appear unless this note indicates that “no appearance is necessary.” Unless directed otherwise, all participants may appear via Zoom: https://tuolumne-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/1615813960?pwd=NTRMT0NwMDg5cnlYdzZ6VnBXWWFsUT09. [Passcode: 123456]. All matters set for hearing in Department 5 are assigned to that department for all pre-trial purposes. Parties retain the right under Cal. Const. art VI §21 to decline consent to the Commissioner serving as a Judge Pro Tem. By participating in the first hearing, or electing not to attend after due notice, parties are deemed to have stipulated to the Commissioner serving as a Judge Pro Tem for the entire case. See CRC 2.816.
This is a collections case. Before the Court this day is an unopposed motion to deem RFAs admitted. The motion cannot be heard this day because the proof of service accompanying the motion contains the wrong address for defense counsel, arguably explaining why the motion is unopposed. In fact, upon close inspection, it appears that the discovery itself was mailed to the wrong suite number, which may explain the “radio silence” from defense counsel. It appears to this Court that plaintiff will have to start all over with this discovery effort.
4/30/2026 3:47 pm
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”