DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25679422·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 8 months agoOFF CALENDAR

PCGR GEARY INVEST CO, LLC VS. JERMAINE BANKSTON ET AL

Motion To Execute/Cancel Order Vacating Abondoning Writ Of Possession

Hearing date
Dec 9, 2025
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPCGR GEARY INVEST CO, LLC
DefendantJERMAINE BANKSTON

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679422 - December 9, 2025 Hearing date: December 9, 2025 Case number: CUD25679422 Case title: PCGR GEARY INVEST CO, LLC VS. JERMAINE BANKSTON ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679422 | Case Title: | | PCGR GEARY INVEST CO, LLC VS. JERMAINE BANKSTON ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-12-09 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion To Execute/Cancel Order Vacating Abondoning Writ Of Possession | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for December 9, 2025. Line 9.

DEFENDANT JERMAIN BANKSTON Motion To Execute/Cancel Order Vacating Abandoning Writ Of Possession; is OFF CALENDAR. No proof of service to Plaintiff's attorney of record. Additionally, notice period is insufficient under CCP 1005, and there is no order on file authorizing this motion to be made on shortened time. =(501/MEW)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share