DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25679883·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing 7 months agoGRANTED

FO 1029 GEARY STREET PROPERTY LLC VS. AARON CLARKE ET AL

Motion To Vacate Default And Judgment

Hearing date
Jan 27, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffFO 1029 GEARY STREET PROPERTY LLC
DefendantAARON CLARKE

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679883 - January 27, 2026 Hearing date: January 27, 2026 Case number: CUD25679883 Case title: FO 1029 GEARY STREET PROPERTY LLC VS. AARON CLARKE ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679883 | Case Title: | | FO 1029 GEARY STREET PROPERTY LLC VS. AARON CLARKE ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-27 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion, Motion, Memorandum Of Points And Authorities And Declaration In Support Ofmotion To Vacate Default And Judgment; Proposed Response; And Proposed Order | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 27, 2026. Line 8.

DEFENDANT AARON CLARKE motion To Vacate Default And Judgment; is GRANTED. No opposition filed. The default of Defendant Aaron Clarke is set aside. The default judgment entered on October 23, 2025 is vacated. The writ issued on December 18, 2025 is recalled. Defendant Aaron Clarke shall file and serve the proposed answer within five days.=(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share