DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25677888·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 9 months agoOFF CALENDAR

1190 MISSION ST LP VS. JARED WILLIAMS ET AL

Motion For Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation

Hearing date
Nov 26, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

Plaintiff1190 MISSION ST LP
DefendantJARED WILLIAMS

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25677888 - November 26, 2025 Hearing date: November 26, 2025 Case number: CUD25677888 Case title: 1190 MISSION ST LP VS. JARED WILLIAMS ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25677888 | Case Title: | | 1190 MISSION ST LP VS. JARED WILLIAMS ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-11-26 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion For Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 26, 2025. Line 4.

PLAINTIFF 1190 MISSION ST LP Motion For Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation is OFF CALENDAR.

Proof of service of the moving papers describes a method of delivery that is not authorized under the Code of Civil Procedure. Additionally, papers must be served separately on each self-represented party. (CRC 1.21.) Proof of service indicates that a single set of moving papers was collectively addressed to all self-represented parties, which is improper. =(501/HEK)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share