GRAND PRIX FIXED LESSEE LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS. DENISE WEEKS

8/27/2026 – Law and Motion Calendar Judge: Honorable Mark A. McCannon – Department 2 Page 15 of 16

2:00 PM LINE 9 26-UDU-00738 GRAND PRIX FIXED LESSEE LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS. DENISE WEEKS

GRAND PRIX FIXED LESSEE LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY THOMAS S. MCCONNELL DENISE WEEKS PRO SE

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses

TENTATIVE RULING:

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff Grand Prix Fixed Lessee LLC’s unopposed Motion to Compel Discovery Responses is GRANTED.

Where a party to whom interrogatories or requests for production are directed fails to serve timely responses, that party waives any objection to the discovery, including objections based on privilege or work product protection, and the propounding party may move for an order compelling responses. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.290, subds. (a), (b), 2031.300, subds. (a), (b).)

Here, Plaintiff served Defendant Denise Weeks with four sets of written discovery on July 24, 2026: Requests for Production of Documents, Set One; Form Interrogatories, Set One; Special Interrogatories, Set One; and Requests for Admission, Set One. (Swearingen Decl., ¶ 2 & Ex. A.) Defendant’s responses were due by August 3, 2026. Plaintiff received responses only to the Requests for Admission. (Id., ¶ 3.) Plaintiff sent Defendant a meet-and-confer letter on August 7, 2026, but received no response to the letter and no responses to the outstanding discovery. (Id., ¶¶ 4–5.)

Accordingly, the Motion is GRANTED.

Defendant is ordered to serve verified responses, without objection, to Plaintiff’s Requests for Production of Documents, Set One; Form Interrogatories, Set One; and Special Interrogatories, Set One, within five days after service of notice of this order.

If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court. Thereafter, counsel for Plaintiff shall prepare a written order consistent with the Court’s ruling for the Court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312, and provide written notice of the ruling to all parties who have appeared in the action, as required by law and the California Rules of Court. The Court directs the parties to San Mateo County Superior Court Local Rule 3.403(b)(iv) regarding the wording of proposed orders.