| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Responses To Written Discovery And Request For Sanctions
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680615 - May 18, 2026 Hearing date: May 18, 2026 Case number: CUD25680615 Case title: 57 TAYLOR I7, LP VS. GILBERT MARTINEZ ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680615 | Case Title: | | 57 TAYLOR I7, LP VS. GILBERT MARTINEZ ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-18 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Responses To Written Discovery And Request For Sanctions | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 18, 2026. Line 7.
PLAINTIFF 57 TAYLOR I7, LP Motion To Compel Responses To Written Discovery And Request For Sanctions is GRANTED, subject to opposition. Defendant shall serve complete verified responses without objection to Plaintiff's Form Interrogatories-Unlawful Detainer (Set One); and Requests for Production of Documents (Set One) within 5 days of notice of entry of order. Sanctions granted in the amount of $1800. =(501/DWH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”