DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV162809·alameda·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing todayGRANTED IN PART

MENOR, et al. vs CHANEL, INC., et al.

Ex Parte Application to advance the hearing on Motion to Compel discovery responses

Hearing date
Aug 27, 2026
Department
18
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Sep 17, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Ex Parte Application rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJovy Menor
DefendantTarte, Inc.
DefendantChanel, Inc.

Ruling

26CV162809: MENOR, et al. vs CHANEL, INC., et al. 08/27/2026 Hearing on Ex Parte Application TO ADVANCE THE HEARING ON TARTE, INC.’S MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF JOVY MENOR RE SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE, AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AU in Department 18

Tentative Ruling - 08/27/2026 Patrick McKinney

Defendant Tarte, Inc.’s (“Tarte”) application for an order advancing the hearing date on its Motion to Compel further responses from Plaintiff Jovy Menor is GRANTED IN PART.

The Hearing on Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses filed by TARTE, INC. (Defendant) CRS# 103870248938 scheduled for 09/22/2026 is reset to 09/17/2026 at 01:30 PM in Department 18 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse.

Any opposition and reply papers shall be filed and served consistent with the Code of Civil Procedure.

Defendant Tarte's counsel must forthwith serve a copy of this order on all counsel of record and self-represented parties. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING: If the parties do not contest the tentative ruling, it will be adopted. Any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling must notify the court by email at Dept18@alameda.courts.ca.gov, and notify all opposing counsel or unrepresented parties by 12:00 pm the day of the hearing.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share