Ex Parte Application to Advance Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendant Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.’s Further Responses to Plaintiffs’ Special Interrogatories, Set One and Request for Production of Documents, Set Two
26CV162809: MENOR, et al. vs CHANEL, INC., et al. 08/13/2026 Hearing on Ex Parte Application to Advance Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendant Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.’s Further Responses to Plaintiffs’ Special Interrogatories, Set One and Request for Production of Documents, Set Two (CRS# 954882375946) CRS# A-162809-028 in Department 18
Tentative Ruling - 08/12/2026 Patrick McKinney
Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application to Advance the Hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Further Responses from Defendant Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. is GRANTED IN PART. None of the requested dates are available due to earlier scheduled and/or advanced motions in this case.
The Hearing on Motion to Compel Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel defendant Ulta, Cosmetics & Fragrance Inc.'s Further Responses to SROG1 and RPD2; filed by JOVY MENOR (Plaintiff) + CRS# 954882375946 scheduled for 11/03/2026 is reset to 09/10/2026 at 01:30 PM in Department 18 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse.
Opposition and reply papers shall be filed consistent with the Code of Civil Procedure.
Plaintiffs' counsel must forthwith serve a copy of this order on all counsel of record and selfrepresented parties. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.
CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING: If the parties do not contest the tentative ruling, it will be adopted. Any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling must notify the court by email at Dept18@alameda.courts.ca.gov, and notify all opposing counsel or unrepresented parties by 4pm the day before the hearing.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”