DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
201900527363PRCE·ventura·Probate·Conservatorship
Hearing todayThe court reviewed the status report and found it complete. Appearance is excused if proof of service and investigator's report are filed; otherwise continued to 2026-09-29.

In The Matter Of Tanya Linnea Morris

Annual/Biennial Status Report Conservatorship Review

Hearing date
Aug 25, 2026
Department
J6
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 29, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Ruling

201900527363PRCE: In The Matter Of Tanya Linnea Morris 08/25/2026 in Department J6 Hearing re: Annual/Biennial Status Report Conservatorship Review

The status report was filed on 8/3/26. The Court has reviewed the status report. It is complete. No appearance required.

The next biennial status report shall be served and filed by 8/11/28 and set for a hearing on 9/12/28 at 10:30 AM in Department J6. The next court investigator’s report shall be filed by 8/11/28. Ventura County Local Rule 10.02(J)(2) states that the “conservator must serve a copy of the status report to the individuals identified in Probate Code §2351.2(a)(2)(A) and file a proof of service.” As of 8/18/26 no proof of service has been filed. If not filed before the hearing, or the Court does not find good cause to waive it, the Court will continue this hearing to 9/29/26 at 10:30 a.m. in J6 in order for the proof of service to be filed. As of 8/18/26 the Court Investigator’s report has not been filed. Unless the report is filed before the hearing, the Court intends to continue the hearing to 9/29/26 at 10:30 AM in Department J6. The clerk shall give notice.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share