DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PR0131·eldorado·Probate·Trust Administration
Hearing about 1 month agoCONTINUED

MATTER OF BRULHART FAMILY TRUST

Petition Re: Trust Administration

Hearing date
Jul 17, 2026
Department
FOUR
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 31, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PetitionerSimone Kaplan
RespondentAndree Brulhart

Ruling

PROBATE CALENDAR JULY 17, 2026

3. MATTER OF BRULHART FAMILY TRUST, 26PR0131

Petition Re: Trust Administration

On May 08, 2026, petitioner Simone Kaplan filed a petition requesting the court to

(1) assume jurisdiction over trust; (2) confirm trustee; (3) compel turnover of source

documentation for accounting; (4) settle accounts; (5) review acts of trustee; (6) set

aside any improper acts of trustee; (7) compel redress of breach of trust; (8) remove

trustee; and (9) appoint alternative trustee or receiver, or alternatively, compel trustee

to perform duties. On July 15, 2026, the respondent trustee Andree Brulhart filed a response, which is

78 pages long (including exhibits) and which the court needs additional time to fully

review and consider. Petitioner also needs sufficient time to reply. The court, on its own

motion and in the interest of justice, continues the hearing on the petition to

July 31, 2026. Petitioner shall file a reply no later than July 24, 2026.

TENTATIVE RULING # 3: THE COURT, ON ITS OWN MOTION, AND IN THE INTEREST OF

JUDICIAL ECONOMY, CONTINUES THE HEARING TO 8:30 A.M., FRIDAY, JULY 31, 2026, IN

DEPARTMENT FOUR. PETITIONER SHALL FILE A REPLY NO LATER THAN JULY 24, 2026.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share