Matter of the JT Trust
Petition for Internal Affairs and Elder Abuse
Motion type
Causes of action
Parties
Ruling
the time of the acquisition, plaintiff's mother "provided approximately $47,000 [to] $50,000 toward the down payment" of the real property; plaintiff has "repaid approximately $18,000" toward the mother's loan, while defendant has repaid "approximately $1,000" toward the mother's loan. It appears plaintiff and defendant "resided" in the real property "as their family home" until recently. Plaintiff has "continuously contributed one-half of the monthly mortgage payment" and has "contributed to the maintenance and preservation of the" real property "through payment of household and operational expenses."
Plaintiff alleges that she has "contributed to acquisition and preservation" of the real property (i.e., she did all that she has done) "with the understanding that she possessed an ownership interest" in the real property. "Defendant has refused to enter into a final written agreement resolving the ownership dispute."
Defendant, also in propria persona, demurs to both causes of action. Plaintiff, with counsel, filed and served a first amended pleading on July 29, 2026, raising five new causes of action. No doubt the first amended complaint was intended to moot the demurrer. Code of Civil Procedure section 472, subdivision (a) permits this, which reads as follows: "A party may amend its pleading once without leave of court at any time before the answer, demurrer, or motion to strike is filed, or after a demurrer or motion to strike is filed but before the demurrer . . . is heard if the amended pleading is filed and served no later than the date for the filing of the opposition to the demurrer . . . ." (Emphasis added.)
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1005, subdivision (b), opposition to a demurrer has to be filed nine (9) court days before the hearing. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 12c, subdivision (a), where "any law requires an act to be performed no later than a specified number of days before a hearing date, the last day to perform the act shall be determined by counting backward from the hearing date, excluding the date of the hearing as provided by Section 12." Under this calculation, the first amended complaint is timely (as it was filed and served exactly nine (9) court days before the August 11, 2026 hearing date). Accordingly, defendant's demurrer is now moot and will be taken off calendar.
Tentative Ruling: Matter of the JT Trust Tentative Ruling: Matter of the JT Trust Case Number
Case Type Trust Hearing Date / Time Tue, 07/28/2026 - 09:00 Nature of Proceedings Petition for Internal Affairs and Elder Abuse Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: Appearances required.
On February 17, 2026, Tedd Barnett filed a Petition to 1) Determine Validity of Trust; 2) Impose Constructive Trust; and 3) Award Damages and Other Relief for Wrongful Taking and Financial Elder Abuse. The petition cited to Probate Code sections 86, 259, 850, 853, 859, 16420, 17200, 21380, and Welfare and Institution's Code section 15600, et seq.
No objection is on file as of July 21, 2026. The filing of an objection would place this matter at issue and requiring evidentiary hearing to resolve. (In re Estate of Lensch (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 667, 676; Conservatorship of Farrant (2021) 67 Cal.App.5th 370, 377.) Any Respondents desirous to object to the Petition, must file a written objection before the hearing. The court has authority to require all objectors to file a written objection pursuant CRC, Rule 7.801, or else deem the failure to do so a waiver.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”