DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24STCV10521·la·Civil·Civil Litigation
Hearing in about 1 hourDENIED as moot

Victor Manuel Aguilar, et al. v. Peterson 24 Asset LLC, et al.

Motion to Deem Request for Admissions Admitted

Hearing date
Aug 19, 2026
Department
735
Judge
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$690

Parties

PlaintiffVictor Manuel Aguilar
DefendantPeterson 24 Asset LLC

Ruling

(Stanley Mosk Courthouse: Dept. 735) August 19, 2026 DEPARTMENT 735 LAW AND MOTION RULINGS

Peterson 24 Asset LLC, et al. Motion to Deem Request for Admissions Admitted

On February 17, 2026, Defendant propounded upon Plaintiffs, Request for Admissions, Set One. (Kashefipour Decl., P. 3; Exhs. B-C.) Responses were due by March 23, 2026. Plaintiff did not provide timely responses. Thus, defendants on April 26, 2026, filed their motion to deem requests for admission admitted.

After defendants filed their motion, Plaintiffs served on May 1, 2026, verified responses to the subject Request for Admissions on May 1, 2026, making the motion moot. (Avakian Decl., P. 3; Ex. A.)

Plaintiff contends the action as well as this motion are stayed and not properly before this Court because Defendant filed a notice under Insurance Code Sec. 1063.6 staying this action pending the liquidation of her insurance carrier's assets. However, the notice states that the case would be stayed for 60 days after the entry of the order of the liquidation, which was on June 10, 2026. Sixty days from June 10, 2026, is August 9, 2026. Thus, based on the notice, the case is no longer stayed.

Defendant seeks $690 in sanctions against Plaintiffs and counsel of record. Plaintiff opposes sanctions because, according to plaintiff, defendant did not properly serve the discovery on plaintiff's case coordinator or legal secretaries who are charged with calendaring all deadlines to ensure they are met which is why responses were not timely served. (Avakian Decl., P. 4; see Kashefipour Decl., Exh. A.) Counsel was included in the service list. Code of Civil Procedure Sec.1010.6 does not say that the legal secretaries or case coordinator must be included in the service list. Thus, there was proper service.

CONCLUSION

The court denies as moot Defendant's motion to deem request for admissions admitted. Plaintiff is ordered to pay $690 in attorney's fees as sanctions within 30 days. Defendant shall give notice. | Home -->)" -->

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share