DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26-01537689·orange·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

Padilla Hernandez vs. Pacific Specialty Insurance Company

Motion to Deem Facts Admitted

Hearing date
Jul 24, 2026
Department
C12
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$960

Parties

PlaintiffMario Padilla Hernandez
DefendantPacific Specialty Insurance Company

Attorneys

Doernfor Defendant

Ruling

The court orders the prior stay ordered on 3-7-25 to be LIFTED.

Defendants James Ponce, Taylor Conant, Eric Ferentz, Sal DeAlba, and Robert Yang are granted until August 3, 2026, to file and serve responsive pleadings.

The Status Conference re: Arbitration set for September 3, 2026, is VACATED.

A Case Management Conference is set for September 3, 2026, at 9:30 a.m. in Department C12.

Clerk shall give notice to all parties.

8. Padilla Hernandez vs. Pacific Specialty Insurance Company

26-01537689

Motion to Deem Facts Admitted

Defendant Pacific Specialty Insurance Company’s motion to deem matters admitted is GRANTED. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280.)

The court orders the matters set forth in defendant’s first set of requests for admission to plaintiff Mario Padilla Hernandez (Doern Decl. at Ex. A) deemed admitted.

Sanctions in the amount of $960 are GRANTED in favor of defendant and against plaintiff, payable within 30 days of notice.

Defendant shall give notice of this ruling.

9. Beijing Luode Property Management Co., Ltd. vs. Qin

20-01151826

Motion for Attorney Fees

On the Court’s own motion, this hearing is CONTINUED to August 14, 2026.

Court orders Clerk to give notice.

10. Perry vs. Prestige Surgery Center at Newport Beach

24-01409325

Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication

OFF CALENDAR

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share