THOMAS vs SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP
MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH DEPOSITION SUBPOENA FOR PRODUCTION OF BUSINESS RECORDS SERVED UPON UNICARE SURGERY CENTER
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL THOMAS vs SOUTHERN COMPLIANCE WITH DEPOSITION CALIFORNIA SUBPOENA FOR PRODUCTION OF
PERMANENTE BUSINESS RECORDS SERVED MEDICAL GROUP UPON UNICARE SURGERY CENTER Tentative Ruling:
The motion is unopposed, but there is no proof of service of the motion and accompanying documents on Unicare. The hearing is continued to September 30, 2026, at 8:30 a.m., to allow an opportunity for the proof of service to be filed.
4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES AS TO ROTOLO CHEVROLET INC DEFENDANT ROTOLO CHEVROLET’S FURTHER RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE
MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER CAMPOS vs GENERAL CVRI2600583 RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR MOTORS LLC PRODUCTION AS TO ROTOLO CHEVROLET INC DEFENDANT ROTOLO CHEVROLET’S FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE
MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORY SET ONE Tentative Ruling:
A party may file a motion compelling further answers to interrogatories and requests for production if it finds that the response is inadequate, incomplete, or evasive, or an
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”