DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV139289·alameda·Civil·Case Management / Default Judgment Compliance
Hearing todayOrdered Plaintiff to show cause regarding sanctions for failure to comply with court order

ZIPCAR, A CORPORATION vs KUMAR

Order to Show Cause re: failure to file default judgment packet

Hearing date
Aug 18, 2026
Department
15
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 15, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$750

Parties

PlaintiffZIPCAR, A CORPORATION
DefendantKUMAR

Ruling

25CV139289: ZIPCAR, A CORPORATION vs KUMAR 08/18/2026 Initial Case Management Conference in Department 15

Tentative Ruling - 08/11/2026 Peter Borkon

ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

The Court has ordered the following after review of the case, including timely filed Case Management Statements, without a conference.

Plaintiff is in violation of this Court's April 28, 2026 order requiring a revised default judgment packet within 21 days. Four months later, Plaintiff has not refiled.

The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause why they should not be sanctioned $750 for this violation of the Court's order.

The Court sets this matter for an Order to Show Cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with a Court Order. Order to Show Cause Re: failure to file default judgment packet is set for 09/15/2026 at 03:00 PM in Department 15 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse.

Failure to comply or appear may result in sanctions pursuant to one or more of the following: CRC 2.30, CRC 3.1340, CCP 177.5, CCP 575.2, CCP 583.150, CCP 583.360, CCP 583.410, CCP 583.420, CCP 583.430, and Government Code Section 68608.

If you contest the tentative ruling you must do so in a timely manner in accordance with the Local Rules. Failure to alert the Court and the opposing side or to appear will result in the Court affirming its tentative ruling. If the tentative ruling is uncontested, no appearance is necessary and the Court's tentative ruling will become a final order of the Court after the hearing.

Counsel must carefully review the order which will set forth the Court's reasoning. Counsel must also review Dept. 15's information page, which contains answers to frequently asked questions, and sets forth guidance for communicating with the department and litigating certain motions and proceedings. This information is available on the eCourt Public Portal at www.eportal.alameda.courts.ca.gov under the “Direct Calendaring” tab. If any party contests, the zoom login credentials are:

Join ZoomGov Meeting https://alameda-courts-cagov.zoomgov.com/j/16116905917?pwd=SUQrVFJYbTU0VENvVFdoWlduMVNsUT09 Meeting ID: 161 1690 5917 Passcode: 315

Clerk is directed to serve copies of this order, with proof of service, to counsel and to selfrepresented parties of record. 25CV139289: ZIPCAR, A CORPORATION vs KUMAR 08/18/2026 Initial Case Management Conference in Department 15 The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share