BECERRA vs AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.
Motion to Compel Discovery
Motion type
Causes of action
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Ruling
25CV116942: BECERRA vs AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. 08/18/2026 Hearing on Motion to Compel Discovery (not "Further Discovery") filed by AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. (Defendant) CRS# 467679877858 in Department 518
Tentative Ruling - 08/13/2026 Mark Fickes
The Motion to Compel Discovery (not Further Discovery) - 1 moving party, 1 motion filed by AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. on 07/27/2026 is Granted in Part.
This case involves claims alleged under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act brought by Plaintiff Veronica Martinez Becerra against Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (Honda)
On July 3, 2026, Honda served the first notice of deposition on Plaintiff. (Vault Decl. ¶ 3, ex. A.) Plaintiffs deposition was noticed for July 15, 20256. Honda emailed Plaintiff twice to confirm whether this date would work. (Vault decl. ¶¶ 4 5, ex. B.)
On July 13, 2026, Plaintiff responded that only July 29, 31, or August 7, 2026 would work, Honda accepted July 29, 2026. (Vault Decl. ¶¶ 6 7, ex. B.) The amended deposition notice was sent on July 14, 2026. (Vault Decl., ex. C.)
On July 24, 2026, Plaintiff served objections and the same day Honda corresponded with Plaintiffs counsel to confirm the objections were sent in error. (Vault Decl. 8 9, Exs. D E.) During this communication, Plaintiff requested the deposition be on August 5, 2026. (Id. at ex. E.)
On July 24, 2026 Plaintiff served the amended notice of deposition and informed Plaintiff that they would be filing this motion since trial was quickly approaching. (Vault Decl. ¶ 11, ex. F.)
On July 27, 2026, Honda filed this motion to compel Plaintiffs deposition and request sanctions in the amount of $1,660.
On July 30, 2026, Honda filed a motion to advance the hearing which was granted on August 4, 2026.
This motion is unopposed.
It is unclear if the deposition occurred on August 5, 2026; however, since there is no opposition and this motion has not been withdrawn, it is presumed that the deposition did not occur.
Trial is currently set for September 8, 2026.
Discovery tests the pleadings and allows a party to determine what the opponents contentions are and what facts she relies upon to support her contentions. (Burke v. Superior Court of 25CV116942: BECERRA vs AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. 08/18/2026 Hearing on Motion to Compel Discovery (not "Further Discovery") filed by AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. (Defendant) CRS# 467679877858 in Department 518 Sacramento County (1969) 71 Cal.2d 276, 281.) Honda shows good cause to compel Plaintiffs deposition especially since Plaintiff is no longer in possession of the car. (MPA p. 4.)
Hondas discovery request is relevant to the issues raised in the complaint and is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Thus, the Court construes Plaintiffs failure to oppose the motion as a concession that the motion is meritorious. (Sexton v. Superior Court (1997) 58 Cal. App. 4th 1403, 1410.)
ORDER
Plaintiffs unopposed motion to compel Plaintiffs deposition is GRANTED. Plaintiff Veronica Martinez Becerra is ORDERED to sit for deposition on or before August 21, 2026.
Hondas request for sanctions is GRANTED IN PART. Honda stated that Counsel spent 1.5 hours preparing this motion, expected to spend 1.5 hours reviewing and responding to the opposition, and one hour attending the hearing. Since the motion was not opposed, the Court awards reasonable fees in the amount of $1,400 (3.5 hours at an hourly rate of $400 per hour.) along with the $60 motion fee. Plaintiff shall pay $1,400 in monetary sanctions to Honda no later than September 18, 2026.
---
PLEASE NOTE: Pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1308, subdivision (a)(1), this tentative ruling will become the order of the Court unless it is contested before 4:00 PM on the court day preceding the noticed hearing.
To contest a tentative ruling, a party should do the following:
First, the party must notify Department 518, by email at Dept518@alameda.courts.ca.gov and copy all counsel of record and self-represented parties. The contesting party must state in the subject line of the email the case name, case number and motion.
Second, the party shall log into the eCourt Public Portal, search for this case (e.g., by case number), select the case name, select the "Tentative Rulings" tab, click the "Click to Contest this Ruling" button, enter the party's name and a brief statement of the party's reason for contesting the tentative, and click "Proceed."
Please note the Court does not permit remote appearances for motions for summary judgment that are contested. If you contest a Motion for Summary Judgment, you must appear in person.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
25CV116942: BECERRA vs AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. 08/18/2026 Hearing on Motion to Compel Discovery (not "Further Discovery") filed by AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. (Defendant) CRS# 467679877858 in Department 518 For all other motions (unless otherwise noted in the tentative ruling), Parties may appear via videoconference, using the Zoom.com website or application. TO CONNECT TO ZOOM: Department 518 is inviting you to a scheduled ZoomGov meeting.
Topic: Department 518's Personal Meeting Room
Join ZoomGov Meeting https://alameda-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/16054307984
Meeting ID: 160 5430 7984
One tap mobile +16692545252,,16054307984# US (San Jose) +14154494000,,16054307984# US (US Spanish Line)
---
Dial by your location +1 669 254 5252 US (San Jose)
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”