Dennis House vs. Vanderhall Motor Works, Inc., et al.

LINE CASE NO. CASE TITLE TENTATIVE RULING 9:00 22CV404448 Dennis House vs. Plaintiff moves this court to strike Defendant’s answer. According to Defendant’s 1 Vanderhall Motor opposition brief, Defendant has agreed to take motion off calendar. Works, Inc.,et.al. 9:00 22CV408165 Andrew Mo vs. See below, Line items 2-3 2-4 Samsung Research America, Inc. Line Item No.4: Defendant petitions this court to compel Plaintiff for production of 3rd set of documents and 3rd Set of Special Interrogatories.

This court finds that Defendant’s RFP Production No. 40 is overbroad. Petition to compel production NO.40 of Defendants 3rd set of documents is DENIED. With regards to Special Interrogatories Set 3 No. 67, this court finds that Plaintiff complied with request. Petition to Compel Special Interrogatory No. 67, Set 3 is DENIED. All other RFP from Defendant’s Request for Production of Documents, Set 3 is GRANTED—Plaintiff is ordered to produce a privilege log. All other Requests for Special Interrogatories Set 3 is GRANTED—Plaintiff is ordered to produce a privilege log.

Plaintiff is ordered to produce documents within seven days. Monetary sanctions is GRANTED—Court requests argument as to the amount. 9:00 22CV409123 Esmeralda Guzman, Defendants move this court to bifurcate trial. Defendant argues that bifurcation 5 et.al. vs. Paula would increase judicial economy and serve the interests of justice. This court is Arroyo, et.al. not in agreement that such bifurcation is appropriate in this case. The facts related to the various issues Defendant suggests bifurcating involve the same witnesses and related legal issues.

Defendants’ motion is DENIED. 9:00 23CV424190 AI Technology & Case is off calendar. 6 Systems vs. Renesas Electronics America 9:00 24CV434917 Darcel Stoner vs. SCA Plaintiff moves this court to quash subpoenas served by Defendant. Plaintiff filed 7 of CA, LLC, et.al. suit claiming racial discrimination and emotional distress upon Defendant’s reassigning Plaintiff from Palo Alto to Dublin. Defendant’s subpoenas encompass past employment records that appear relevant to fully investigating Plaintiff’s claims.

Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED subject to limiting the discovery to attorney’s eyes only and to nonprivileged information.

9:00 25CV457159 Shengsheng Guan vs. Plaintiff moves this court to compel further responses to Plaintiff’s form 8 Tong Liu interrogatories and request for production of documents. Defendant responded one day before this motion was filed. Defendant complied with Plaintiff’s discovery requests. Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions is DENIED. 9:00 25CV462532 Anil Jain vs. Ashwini Civil bench warrant was issued to order Defendant to court. 9 Kumar 9:00 25CV486237 David Wu vs. Karina Plaintiff petitions this court to compel Defendant to respond to form interrogatories 10 Duarte and a request to produce documents. Defendant has failed to do so. Plaintiff’s petition is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s motion for monetary sanctions is GRANTED. 9:00 26CV486237 Martha Pulido vs. See below. 11-12 FCA US 9:00 26CV490199 Charles Cheever vs. See below. 13 State Farm General Insurance

3