SHELLEY WIENKE VS. ARMSTRONG ESPERANZATE ET AL
MOTION TO STRIKE ANSWER to Amended COMPLAINT
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679846 - December 8, 2025 Hearing date: December 8, 2025 Case number: CUD25679846 Case title: SHELLEY WIENKE VS. ARMSTRONG ESPERANZATE ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679846 | Case Title: | | SHELLEY WIENKE VS. ARMSTRONG ESPERANZATE ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-12-08 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO STRIKE ANSWER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for December 8, 2025. Line 9.
PLAINTIFF MOTION TO STRIKE ANSWER to Amended COMPLAINT; is OFF CALENDAR. No proof of service on file. Additionally, there is no order authorizing Plaintiff to bring this motion on shortened time. (See CCP 1005(b).) =(501/AAT)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”