Plaintiff’s motion to strike defendant Brian Bernasconi’s answer to the second amended answer; Plaintiff’s motion to compel further responses to discovery
SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 10 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2210
DATE: August 11, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. / 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, you must call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. You must also contact the other side before 4:00 P.M. to inform them that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1); Local Rule 8.D.)
**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**
9:00 A.M. LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING Line 1 23CV417765 Lynley Hogan v. Plaintiff’s motion to strike defendant Brian Bernasconi’s answer to the Brian Bernasconi second amended answer. At plaintiff’s request, the motion is et al. WITHDRAWN and the matter is OFF CALENDAR. Line 2 23CV417765 Lynley Hogan v. Plaintiff’s motion to compel further responses to discovery. At plaintiff’s Brian Bernasconi request, the motion is WITHDRAWN and the matter is OFF CALENDAR. et al. Line 3 23CV423619 Timothy Young Defendant’s demurrer to the first amended complaint.
CONTINUED by ex v. BMW of parte order to August 20, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 10. Plaintiff’s North America, counsel must be prepared at the continued hearing to show cause why he LLC should not be sanctioned for his repeated failure to comply with filing deadlines. Line 4 24CV433441 Michelle Click LINE 4 or scroll down for ruling. Campos v. AUTOZONERS, LLC et al.
2
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”