DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25631020·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 4 months agoThe motion is moot; moving defendants have been dismissed. Plaintiff's oversized opposition and unauthorized sur-reply are stricken.

AIMEE GEORGE VS. OHAGAN MEYER ET AL

Amended Notice Of Motion And Special Motion To Strike Complaint And Causes Of Action Therein Pursuant To Cal. Civ. Proc. Section 425.16 [Anti-Slapp]

Hearing date
Apr 22, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Anti-SLAPP Motion rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAIMEE GEORGE
DefendantOHAGAN MEYER
DefendantJOSEPH LORDAN
DefendantDENNIS STRAZULO
DefendantLEAJE MORRIS

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 22, 2026. Line 3. DEFENDANT OHAGAN MEYER, JOSEPH LORDAN, DENNIS STRAZULO, LEAJE MORRIS Amended Notice Of Motion And Special Motion To Strike Complaint And Causes Of Action Therein Pursuant To Cal. Civ. Proc. Section 425.16 [Anti-Slapp] is moot. The moving defendants have been dismissed.

Plaintiff's oversized opposition filed on March 13, 2026 is stricken. Plaintiff's unauthorized sur-reply is stricken. The Court has previously provided Plaintiff an opportunity to file a proper opposition. (See March 4, 2026 minute order).

On March 13, 2026 Plaintiff filed a 25-page opposition, which does not comply with CRC 3.1113. Plaintiff additionally filed an unauthorized sur-reply (Reply to Dismissed Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition) on March 23, 2026. March 23, 2026 sur-reply is stricken. Moving defendants may file a motion for attorney's fees. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share