DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25631020·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 4 months agoOFF CALENDAR

AIMEE GEORGE VS. OHAGAN MEYER ET AL

Amended Notice Of Motion To Expunge Notice Of Pendency Of Action (Lis Pendens)

Hearing date
Apr 30, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAIMEE GEORGE
DefendantOHAGAN MEYER
DefendantELDREN JONES

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 30, 2026. Line 7. DEFENDANT ELDREN JONES Amended Notice Of Motion To Expunge Notice Of Pendency Of Action (Lis Pendens) is OFF CALENDAR. Pursuant to April 22, 2026 motion and the order were to be personally served. Personal service has not been accomplished per Declaration of Due Diligence of Polo Mann. No relief from failure to comply with April 22, 2026 order was sought or granted according to the register of actions. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share