DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26681020·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing 5 months agoGRANTED

JONES KONG TOM VS. DEIDRA CAHUA ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Hearing date
Apr 2, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJONES KONG TOM
DefendantDEIDRA CAHUA
DefendantPILAR PAYTON

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 2, 2026. Line 8. DEFENDANT DEIDRA CAHUA, PILAR PAYTON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT is GRANTED, subject to opposition. The purported 3-day notice to pay rent or quit attached to Plaintiff's Complaint does not comply with the requirements of CCP 1161(2). The Court notes that, contrary to Defendants' argument, this notice is in writing. Nonetheless, this writing fails to comply with the various specific requirements of the unlawful detainer statutes, most notably CCP 1161(2).

Prevailing party to prepare an order in compliance with CCP 437c(g). =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share