DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25679647·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 5 months agoDENIED

JASON CAO ET AL VS. XIU FANG XIE ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Aside Stipulation For Entry Of Judgment

Hearing date
Mar 23, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJASON CAO
DefendantXIU FANG XIE
DefendantSHUZHANG YU
DefendantWENAN YU

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679647 - March 23, 2026 Hearing date: March 23, 2026 Case number: CUD25679647 Case title: JASON CAO ET AL VS. XIU FANG XIE ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679647 | Case Title: | | JASON CAO ET AL VS. XIU FANG XIE ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-23 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Aside Stipulation For Entry Of Judgment; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 23, 2026. Line 4.

DEFENDANT XIU XIE, SHUZHANG YU, WENAN YU Motion To Aside Stipulation For Entry Of Judgment; Hearing Required to address the relocation payment checks previously issued/sent to the defendants. Motion is DENIED. Defendants do not establish "mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect" under CCP 473(b). =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share