MICHAEL NAVONE VS. RUI XIA AN ET AL

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25677736 - February 9, 2026 Hearing date: February 9, 2026 Case number: CUD25677736 Case title: MICHAEL NAVONE VS. RUI XIA AN ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25677736 | Case Title: | | MICHAEL NAVONE VS. RUI XIA AN ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-09 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 9, 2026. Line 5.

DEFENDANT RUI AN MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT is DENIED. Defendant has not met her initial burden of showing that, based on the undisputed facts, she is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

The Second Amended Complaint, which appropriately reconciled the allegations with the Three Day Notice to Quit, as directed, is not a sham pleading. Nor is the Three Day Notice to Quit defective under Eshagian v. Cepeda (2025) 112 Cal.App.5th 433. The plain language of thisNotice is sufficient that an ordinary occupant would have reasonably understood the deadline by which to vacate the premises. =(501/REQ)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |