WATERBEND SF OWNER LP VS. SHERONDA PERKINS ET AL
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680559 - March 16, 2026 Hearing date: March 16, 2026 Case number: CUD25680559 Case title: WATERBEND SF OWNER LP VS. SHERONDA PERKINS ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680559 | Case Title: | | WATERBEND SF OWNER LP VS. SHERONDA PERKINS ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-16 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 16, 2026. Line 3.2.
DEFENDANT SHERONDA PERKINS, KAYLYN PERKINS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT is DENIED. Moving party failed to comply with CRC 3.1110(a). Moving party failed to carry its burden and show that it is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law and that the operative notice fails to comply with CCP 1161(2). =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”