DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26681073·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 6 months agoHearing Required. Declaration of Sarah Okdie is stricken. Not appropriate on a demurrer.

DBJPM 2016-SFC EMPORIUM, LLC VS. ZECHSAN BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT, INC. ET AL

DEMURRER to COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Feb 26, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDBJPM 2016-SFC EMPORIUM, LLC
DefendantZECHSAN BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT, INC.

Attorneys

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26681073 - February 26, 2026 Hearing date: February 26, 2026 Case number: CUD26681073 Case title: DBJPM 2016-SFC EMPORIUM, LLC VS. ZECHSAN BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT, INC. ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26681073 | Case Title: | | DBJPM 2016-SFC EMPORIUM, LLC VS. ZECHSAN BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT, INC. ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-26 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 26, 2026.

Line 10. DEFENDANT ZECHSAN BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT, INC. DEMURRER to COMPLAINT Hearing Required. Declaration of Sarah Okdie is stricken. Not appropriate on a demurrer. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share