DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24611555·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 2 months agoOFF CALENDAR

JACKLYN IBAY, ET AL VS. FIVE 88 / MISSION BAY BLOCK 7, ET AL

DEMURRER to 1ST Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jul 9, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJACKLYN IBAY
DefendantFIVE 88 / MISSION BAY BLOCK 7
DefendantCHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC.
DefendantRELATED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, L.P.
DefendantTIMOTHY SCOTT WILSON
DefendantKARINA GUERRERO PEREZ

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24611555 - July 9, 2026 Hearing date: July 9, 2026 Case number: CGC24611555 Case title: JACKLYN IBAY, ET AL VS. FIVE 88 / MISSION BAY BLOCK 7, ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24611555 | Case Title: | | JACKLYN IBAY, ET AL VS. FIVE 88 / MISSION BAY BLOCK 7, ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-09 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 9, 2026. Line 1.1.

DEFENDANT CHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., RELATED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, L.P., TIMOTHY SCOTT WILSON, KARINA GUERRERO PEREZ, MISSION BAY BLOCK 7 DEMURRER to 1ST Amended COMPLAINT is OFF CALENDAR.

Parties are ordered to meet and confer as required by CCP 430.41 "in person, by telephone, or by video conference" no later than July 24, 2026 on a mutually agreed upon date. If parties cannot agree, the parties shall meet and confer in person at 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA on July 15, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. If necessary, Defendant may file a demurrer thereafter. Defendant shall not be charged a fee. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share