DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25622373·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing 12 months agoSUSTAINED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

1000 VAN NESS LP VS. 5910 INVESTMENTS, LLC ET AL

DEMURRER to COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Aug 28, 2025
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

Plaintiff1000 VAN NESS LP
Defendant5910 INVESTMENTS, LLC

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25622373 - August 28, 2025 Hearing date: August 28, 2025 Case number: CGC25622373 Case title: 1000 VAN NESS LP VS. 5910 INVESTMENTS, LLC ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25622373 | Case Title: | | 1000 VAN NESS LP VS. 5910 INVESTMENTS, LLC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-28 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for August 28, 2025, line 6.

Defendant's Demurrer to Complaint is SUSTAINED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND.

Plaintiff filed their complaint on February 13, 2025 against 5910 Investments LLC "in its capacity as Performing Parcel Owner." (Complaint, para. 5.)

On April 24 and again on June 16, 2025, this Court in Case No. CGC-24-620014, 5910 Investments LLC v. 1000 Van Ness LP, granted Plaintiff's Motion for Receivership, and suspended 1000 Van Ness LP's rights and powers as Performing Parcel Owner.

On June 9, and again on June 16, 2025, the Court continued the demurrer for supplemental briefing on the effect, if any, the order appointing a receiver would have on this case, and ordered the parties to brief the issue of standing and whether 1000 Van Ness LP is able to maintain the suit as is.

Plaintiff does not dispute 1000 Van Ness LP no longer has standing to pursue this lawsuit "in its capacity as Performing Parcel Owner," but claims that it may bring its claims related to the Parking Garage, in its capacity as an individual parcel owner.

Plaintiff is granted leave to amend to substitute the real party in interest. (Cloud v. Northrop Grumman Corp. (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 995, 1004, 1011.) =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share