DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25679846·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 6 months agoPLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS.

SHELLEY WIENKE VS. ARMSTRONG ESPERANZATE ET AL

Renewed Notice Of Motion And Motion To Strike Defendants' Answer To The First Amended Complaint And Request For Sanctions

Hearing date
Feb 13, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSHELLEY WIENKE
DefendantARMSTRONG ESPERANZATE

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679846 - February 13, 2026 Hearing date: February 13, 2026 Case number: CUD25679846 Case title: SHELLEY WIENKE VS. ARMSTRONG ESPERANZATE ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679846 | Case Title: | | SHELLEY WIENKE VS. ARMSTRONG ESPERANZATE ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-13 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Renewed Notice Of Motion And Motion To Strike Defendants' Answer To The First Amended Complaint And Request For Sanctions | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 13, 2026 line 7. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS. Hearing Required. Parties and counsel to be present in-person at 9:30 a.m. =(501/CFH) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share